Skip to content
Ted Cruz has 99 problems

Ted Cruz plan to punish states that regulate AI shot down in 99-1 vote

The one vote backing moratorium on state AI laws came from Thom Tillis, not Cruz.

Jon Brodkin | 109
Sen. Ted Cruz drinks from a cup during a Senate committee hearing. Sen. Maria Cantwell sits next to him.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on May 8, 2025. Credit: Getty Images | Alex Wong
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on May 8, 2025. Credit: Getty Images | Alex Wong
Story text

Facing overwhelming opposition from both Democrats and Republicans, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) accepted defeat and joined a 99-1 vote against his own plan to punish states that regulate artificial intelligence.

"The Senate came together tonight to say that we can't just run over good state consumer protection laws," Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) said. The Cruz plan would have thwarted state laws related to robocalls, deepfakes, and autonomous vehicles, she said.

The House previously approved a budget bill with a provision to ban state AI regulation for 10 years. The Senate has a rule against including "extraneous matter" in budget reconciliation legislation, which Cruz tried to get around by proposing a 10-year moratorium in which states would be shut out of a $42 billion broadband deployment fund if they try to regulate AI.

The Senate passed the overall budget bill today in a 51-50 vote. Cruz's office said in early June that his proposal aimed to prevent states "from strangling AI deployment with EU-style regulation." Less than three weeks later, his home state of Texas enacted a law regulating the use of artificial intelligence.

Cruz changed his plan, saying that states regulating AI would only be shut out of a $500 million AI fund instead of the $42 billion broadband fund. But Cantwell's office said the new version contained a backdoor that could still threaten states' access to the entire broadband fund.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) teamed up with Cantwell to fight Cruz's plan. Blackburn briefly reached a compromise with Cruz on a five-year moratorium that would allow some forms of AI regulation but then decided the compromise wasn't good enough.

"While I appreciate Chairman Cruz's efforts to find acceptable language that allows states to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI, the current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most," Blackburn said in a statement quoted by Politico last night. "This provision could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives. Until Congress passes federally preemptive legislation like the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework, we can't block states from making laws that protect their citizens."

Cruz blamed “outside interests”

After the compromise fell apart, the Senate voted 99-1 for Blackburn's amendment to remove the AI provision from the budget bill. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) cast the only vote against the amendment.

"Cruz ultimately got behind Blackburn's amendment early Tuesday, acknowledging that 'many of my colleagues would prefer not to vote on this matter,'" according to The Hill. Cruz said the five-year moratorium had support from President Trump and "protected kids and protected the rights of creative artists, but outside interests opposed that deal."

However, Blackburn was quoted as saying that they "weren't able to come to a compromise that would protect our governors, our state legislators, our attorney generals and, of course, House members who have expressed concern over this language... what we know is this—this body has proven that they cannot legislate on emerging technology."

Cantwell pointed out that many state government officials from both major parties opposed the Cruz plan. "Despite several revisions by its author and misleading assurances about its true impact, state officials from across the country, including 17 Republican Governors and 40 state attorneys general, as well [as] conservative and liberal organizations—from the Heritage Foundation to the Center for American Progress—rallied against the harmful proposal," Cantwell's office said.

Cantwell and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) had also filed an amendment to strip the AI moratorium from the bill. Markey said yesterday that "the Blackburn-Cruz so-called compromise is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Despite Republican efforts to hide the true impact of the AI moratorium, the language still allows the Trump administration to use federal broadband funding as a weapon against the states and still prevents states from protecting children online from Big Tech's predatory behavior."

Cantwell said at a recent press conference that 24 states last year started "regulating AI in some way, and they have adopted these laws that fill a gap while we are waiting for federal action." Yesterday, she called the Blackburn/Cruz compromise "another giveaway to tech companies" that "gives AI and social media a brand-new shield against litigation and state regulation."

Photo of Jon Brodkin
Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.
109 Comments